The Cleveland Clinic has painted a picture of value-based care that focuses on enriching the quality and outcomes for patients, emphasizing a shift from reactive to proactive healthcare. The aim is to enhance overall wellness, improve care quality, and integrate preventative screenings to yield better health outcomes.
That's the ideal. But there's a critical piece of the puzzle often glossed over when discussing value: managing costs effectively. As Sachin Jain, MD, outlined in Forbes, the equation is simple: Value equals quality divided by cost. However, when the denominator in this equation—cost—starts to weigh heavily, the quality is at risk of diminishing. What, then, is the real measure of value in healthcare?
Jain, the esteemed leader of SCAN Group & Health Plan, critically examines the healthcare industry's quick-paced adoption and promotion of value-based care, contrasting lofty marketing statements with the tangible results we see.
Metrics Over Patients
In a system where incentives are king, value-based care can sometimes translate to optimizing for metrics instead of optimizing for patient-centric care.
Consider Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). It's been hailed as a success for reducing readmissions, but it's had an unintended consequence: an increase in mortality rates among patients quickly discharged. This exposes a fundamental flaw in value-based care—what's measured doesn't always correlate with "better healthcare outcomes."
The push for value can also prioritize paperwork over people. Administrators may implement checklists to streamline care, but the individual complexities of patients can't be captured in a one-size-fits-all approach. The crunch comes when the time spent on documentation overshadows patient interaction, not to mention that much of this information is distilled into impersonal ICD codes, which often don't capture the nuances of a patient's condition.
"We need a better system to characterize and represent patients," suggests Jung Hoon Son, MD, from pulseData. Current ICD coding, designed for billing rather than patient storytelling, fails to paint a complete picture.
"The data we have is like the ingredients list for a recipe without the instructions," he illustrates. "We're missing the crucial details that inform the full story of a patient's health journey."
In a value-based framework, gleaning relevant patient information is challenging. Modern electronic health records (EHRs) don't always help, relying on generic templates over individual narratives.
Patients as Phenotypes
To deliver care that truly values patient outcomes, we must dive deeper. It's about utilizing all available data—EHR, claims, pharmacy data, and more—to create a holistic picture of individual patients, not just broad population segments.
Machine learning and AI technologies, like those used by pulseData, are pioneering this space, turning vast datasets into actionable patient portraits. Instead of leaning on financial and population metrics, providers can make informed, patient-specific decisions.
This synergy between patients and providers, driven by comprehensive data analysis, could redefine value in healthcare. The goal of increasing quality while controlling costs is noble, but execution often falls short.
Here’s the reality:
The concept of value-based care is commendable. However, the actual implementation often misses the mark, reducing patients to mere numbers and compromising the integrity of care.
By refining data curation and adopting phenotyping, we can combat inherent biases, enhance transparency, and spotlight individuals who might otherwise remain hidden within the healthcare system.
Overcoming the challenges of data fragmentation and quality discrepancies is crucial. Investing in the curation and preparation of comprehensive data libraries could be the key to making value-based care a tangible reality.
The future of healthcare we envision is attainable. With the strategic use of AI, data curation, and patient phenotyping, the principles of value-based care can move beyond theory, fostering economic efficiency and significantly improving the lives of patients and their communities
Comments